Apple: “Sideloading is the DEVIL!”
Apple, Google, and others are attempting to demonize the act of installing software. We can't let them succeed.
Apple released a “White Paper” (which is code for “propaganda pretending to be research”) entitled “Building a Trusted Ecosystem for Millions of Apps“.
The entire purpose of this “White Paper” is to make the case that “Sideloading” of applications onto an iOS device would bring about the end of life as we know it. From the “White Paper”:
“Allowing sideloading would degrade the security of the iOS platform and expose users to serious security risks not only on third-party app stores, but also on the App Store.”
So… what is “Sideloading”?
Allow me to define it for you:
sideloading (verb) [ sahyd – loh – ding ]
The act of installing software on a real computer.
The term “sideloading” is a pretty new one in this context. Here, Apple uses it to mean “installing software without using Apple’s proprietary, locked down, restrictive, anti-competitive software store”. This is why they use the word “sideloading” and don’t simply call this action what it has always been called… “installing software“.
By giving the normal, expected, reasonable activity of “installing software on the computer you purchased” a new name — “sideloading” — they can begin to demonize the term. To use it to scare you.
“Oh, gosh! Sideloading! That has security problems! People will steal my data! I’ll probably get a virus!”
This is a commonly used strategy when trying to convince people that something (good or benign) which they have always done — or always thought — is actually quite bad. Possibly even — bum bum bum! — evil.
Create a new word (or take an existing one), give it the definition of the thing you are trying to discredit, then begin to demonize the new word.
For example, the following simply sounds ridiculous:
“Installing software on the computer you own is dangerous!”
But this…
“Sideloading is dangerous!”
That is a story which, if repeated often enough, can be sold. People can be convinced.
The key for Apple’s success in convincing the public (and lawmakers) that “installing software outside of Apple’s store is bad”… is for news outlets to consistently use the terminology of “sideloading” when talking about the topic, instead of phrases like “installing software”.
This is key: The more articles, blogs, tweets and videos use the term “sideloading” when talking about whether or not “installing software” is “dangerous”… the more people will begin to equate “sideloading” with “dangerous”.
And the more people that make that mental connection… the more likely it will be that companies (like Apple) will be able to lock down systems ever further. Quickly turning computers into devices that we all have decreasing amounts of freedoms on (freedom to repair, freedom to install).
It is critically important that people be reminded what “sideloading” actually is: The ability to install the software you want, the way you want, on the computer you own.
Disappointed you’re jumping on this wagon. The concept that installing software from outside your system’s repository/store can be unwise, applies to Linux as well. The more third party repositories you have enabled, the higher the chance something will break. Elementary OS calls installing a .deb sideloading too. There is nothing wrong with the term.
iOS is the only system that can defend against schools and employers forcing their subjects to install spyware (this is probably what the EU is actually mad about). Until Linux has a solution to that, complaining about Apple’s solution is pointless.
"The more articles, blogs, tweets and videos use the term “sideloading” when talking about whether or not “installing software” is “dangerous”… the more people will begin to equate “sideloading” with “dangerous”."
An article / blog post with a title of "Sideloading is the DEVIL!" showing up in a list of internet search results seems like feeding the beast.